Skip to main content
Facilitate Magazine: Informing Workplace and Facilities Management Professionals - return to the homepage Facilitate magazine logo
  • Search
  • Visit Facilitate Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit Facilitate Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @Facilitate_Mag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute of Workplace and Facilities Management Logo of the Institute of Workplace and Facilities Management

Main navigation

  • Home
  • News
    • Comment
    • People
    • Reports
    • Research
  • Features
    • Analysis
    • Features
    • Round Tables
    • Webinars
  • Outsourcing
    • Contract Finder
    • Contracts
    • FM Business Models
    • Interviews
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Opinion
    • Procurement
    • Trends
  • Know-How
    • Explainers
    • Legal Updates
    • White Papers
  • Jobs
  • Topics
    • Workplace Services
      • Hospitality
      • Catering
      • Cleaning
      • Front of House
      • Grounds Maintenance
      • Helpdesk
      • Mailroom
      • Manned Guarding / Security
      • Pest Control
      • Washroom Services
      • Disaster Recovery
      • Specialist Services
    • Professional Performance
      • Behavioural Change
      • Continual Professional Development
      • Education
      • Management
      • Recruitment
      • Training
    • Workplace Performance
      • Benchmarking
      • Health & Wellbeing
      • Operational Readiness
      • Procurement
      • Security
      • Workplace User Experience
      • Workplace Culture
    • Compliance
      • Health & Safety
      • Risk & Business Continuity
      • Standards
      • Statutory Compliance
    • Building Services
      • Architecture & Construction
      • Asset Management
      • Building Controls
      • Building Fabric
      • Drinking Water
      • Fire Protection
      • HVAC
      • Landscaping
      • Mechanical & Electrical
      • Building Security
      • Water, Drainage & Plumbing
    • Technology
      • Building Information Modelling
      • CAFM
      • Data & Networks
      • Document Management
      • Information Management
      • Internet of Things (IoT)
      • Software & Systems
    • Energy management
      • Energy Management Systems
      • Electricity
      • Gas
      • Solar
      • Wind
    • Sustainability
      • Environmental Quality
      • Social Value
      • Waste Management
      • Recycling
    • Workspace Design
      • Agile Working
      • Fit-Out & Refurbishment
      • Inclusive Access
      • Lighting
      • Office Interiors
      • Signage
      • Space Planning
      • Storage
      • Vehicle Management / Parking
      • Washroom
    • Sectors
      • Corporate Office
      • Education
      • Healthcare
      • Manufacturing
      • International
      • Retail
      • Sports & Leisure
      • Regions
  • Buyers' Guide
Quick links:
  • Home
  • News
  • Comment
Topics

Improvement projects should make things better, shouldn't they?

Open-access content Monday 18th March 2013 — updated 3.30pm, Tuesday 26th May 2020
John Bowen

 

18 March 2013


I travel by bus and train as often as I can, not just because of the green aspects, but because I quite like it.


I get to look around and to think in a way that I can't afford to do when I am driving, but looking around and thinking can lead to seeing and realising. For someone who has a long record of customer service, seeing and realising can mean trouble.

The first thing that strikes me as I head to my local station is the £1m+ scheme to "improve" the station forecourt. This was apparently done because those responsible felt that the old one did not portray a good image for the town and there was allegedly an issue that first timers leaving the station could not find the town centre; quite what part of walk straight on and you can't miss it was causing a problem I'm not sure, but a couple of signs would have cost a lot less than several months of disruption and over a million quid.

What upsets me most about this scheme is the appalling waste of space, for we now have a vast area of nothing that folks wanting to get between the station entrance and a bus or taxi have to cross. Surely in the interest of portraying a decent image we could have allowed them some sort of cover, but no, they are now far further away from the shelter of the canopy than they were before this idiotic vanity project was commissioned.

The same applies to the station car park, where the main access to street level is down a set of stairs that deposit you at the side of the main road 100 metres away from the station and which have been unaltered certainly in the 30 years that I have lived in the town. To have included an improved access in the new scheme would have been simple, but no.

As the station is predominantly used by people who live in the town and work elsewhere or vice versa the question of the occasional first time visitor is nonsense, so why were the needs of the regulars not taken into account?

Next to Paddington, where the concourse is somewhat tidier that it used to be, but once again there have been new works completed that have not improved life for the people who use the station. The cab rank is now a hideous walk from the ticket barriers, and this is somewhere that used to have the cabs run right through the middle of the place.

Now your cab is a cab ride away, and the access to the Hammersmith & City line has been moved to the far end of the new cab rank and about twice as long a walk as it was before. Improving things for travellers? Hardly: You're stuck with the extra walk to the Hammersmith & City platform, but why are cab drivers are offering to drop you off by the front entrance to the station to save you the time and expense of going around to the new rank?

I've managed a lot of projects over the years and all of them were intended to make things easier for those who used the results, not to make life harder. The way that we worked was always to be talking to users and trying to understand their needs: Regardless of why the project was commissioned or scoped, we always asked what else we could improve.

Sure there will be times when something new inconveniences a minority of folks, but the aim should always to be to bring a benefit to as many as possible. To my mind neither of the above has achieved that aim.


John Bowen is an FM consultant
http://thatconsultantbloke.wordpress.com/
Also filed in:
Comment
Content
Topics

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Today's top reads

 

Latest Jobs

Project Leader (Maternity Cover One Year Contract)

Cambridge
Circa £50,000 Pro Rata + Benefits & Opportunities
Reference
56378

Maintenance Supervisor

Surrey
Up to £43,000 + Excellent Package & Opportunities
Reference
56376

Regional Facilities Manager

South West England
Circa £40,000 + Benefits & Opportunities
Reference
56375
See all jobs »

 

 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to print

Sign up to receive our bi-monthly magazine

Subscribe
Facilitate magazine cover, June 2020
​
FOLLOW US
@Facilitate_Mag
Facilitate Magazine
Facilitate Magazine
CONTACT US
Contact us
Tel: 020 7880 6200
​

IWFM

About IWFM
Become a member
Qualifications
Events

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to Facilitate Magazine
Write for Facilitate Magazine

General

IWFM Jobs
Help

© 2022 • www.facilitatemagazine.com and Facilitate Magazine are published by Redactive Media Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ