Skip to main content
Facilitate Magazine: Informing Workplace and Facilities Management Professionals - return to the homepage Facilitate magazine logo
  • Search
  • Visit Facilitate Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit Facilitate Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @Facilitate_Mag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute of Workplace and Facilities Management Logo of the Institute of Workplace and Facilities Management

Main navigation

  • Home
  • News
    • Comment
    • People
    • Reports
    • Research
  • Features
    • Analysis
    • Features
    • Round Tables
    • Webinars
  • Outsourcing
    • Contract Finder
    • Contracts
    • FM Business Models
    • Interviews
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Opinion
    • Procurement
    • Trends
  • Know-How
    • Explainers
    • Legal Updates
    • White Papers
  • Jobs
  • Topics
    • Workplace Services
      • Hospitality
      • Catering
      • Cleaning
      • Front of House
      • Grounds Maintenance
      • Helpdesk
      • Mailroom
      • Manned Guarding / Security
      • Pest Control
      • Washroom Services
      • Disaster Recovery
      • Specialist Services
    • Professional Performance
      • Behavioural Change
      • Continual Professional Development
      • Education
      • Management
      • Recruitment
      • Training
    • Workplace Performance
      • Benchmarking
      • Health & Wellbeing
      • Operational Readiness
      • Procurement
      • Security
      • Workplace User Experience
      • Workplace Culture
    • Compliance
      • Health & Safety
      • Risk & Business Continuity
      • Standards
      • Statutory Compliance
    • Building Services
      • Architecture & Construction
      • Asset Management
      • Building Controls
      • Building Fabric
      • Drinking Water
      • Fire Protection
      • HVAC
      • Landscaping
      • Mechanical & Electrical
      • Building Security
      • Water, Drainage & Plumbing
    • Technology
      • Building Information Modelling
      • CAFM
      • Data & Networks
      • Document Management
      • Information Management
      • Internet of Things (IoT)
      • Software & Systems
    • Energy management
      • Energy Management Systems
      • Electricity
      • Gas
      • Solar
      • Wind
    • Sustainability
      • Environmental Quality
      • Social Value
      • Waste Management
      • Recycling
    • Workspace Design
      • Agile Working
      • Fit-Out & Refurbishment
      • Inclusive Access
      • Lighting
      • Office Interiors
      • Signage
      • Space Planning
      • Storage
      • Vehicle Management / Parking
      • Washroom
    • Sectors
      • Corporate Office
      • Education
      • Healthcare
      • Manufacturing
      • International
      • Retail
      • Sports & Leisure
      • Regions
  • Buyers' Guide
Quick links:
  • Home
  • News
  • Comment
Topics

The myth of centralised procurement

Open-access content Monday 12th August 2013 — updated 3.30pm, Tuesday 26th May 2020
John Bowen

 

12 August 2013

The arguments for centralising activity - procurement or otherwise - can be very persuasive, but so many of them are built on selective use of numbers.


I am not procurement bashing here for I am one of their number, but I would like to try and present a balanced view based on what I have seen and experienced over the years.

The first question to ask is whether or not centralisation is right for, not just your organisation, but for what you want to centralise. Not everything lends itself to being centralised in any organisation, although some - retail is a good example - are made for a central approach.

If centralisation is an option, which products or services lend themselves to a central approach? That's going to depend on your organisational needs and making generalisations here would be to perpetuate the myth, for any decision on whether or not to centralise procurement for any line or category is one that needs to be taken with care. It needs to be considered in the light of business strategy and the marketplace, and the procurement method chosen has to support the strategic goals.

A product or category that is centralised may not always need to be so and it can make sense to move from centralised to decentralised as best suits business needs. All organisations are dynamic and so their needs change over time. Varying procurement methods to suit those changes should be standard procedure.

Having a balanced range of procurement methods is what is needed, not bland generalisations. It may sound obvious to standardise PCs, for example, but I've seen examples of organisations providing standard specification PCs across the board when they don't need to and thus paying several times more than they need.

It does little for end user credibility when they know that they could have bought the PC they need for half the price at their local retail park. In another case, there was a proposal to shave a fraction of a penny of each consumable by standardising, when to do so would have cost thousands in terms of changing the equipment that used the consumables - the equipment had to be different and each needed a different consumable.

I think that there are lies, damned lies and statistics, but that procurement savings come next in the series. That isn't to say that savings are not true - they very much are, but some of the numbers that are bandied around are projections or assumptions made on the basis that if the organisation buys a certain quantity and a given price they will make that saving.

The problem with that premise is that, in many cases, the quantities actually bought over time are different and so the savings predictions made when the contract is placed are under or over fulfilled. All too often, especially in the public sector, you are told that an initiative will save millions or more, but procurement savings should be judged in retrospect - over the past year we have saved £x.

Centralisation has its merits, but the myth of centralised procurement is built on the dual premise of sweeping generalisations and savings assumptions. Procurement professionals work on real numbers and to organisational goals; they will centralise when they need to, and only then. As always, a balanced approach works best.


John Bowen is an FM consultant
http://thatconsultantbloke.wordpress.com/


Also filed in:
Comment
Content
Topics

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Today's top reads

 

Latest Jobs

Project Leader (Maternity Cover One Year Contract)

Cambridge
Circa £50,000 Pro Rata + Benefits & Opportunities
Reference
56378

Maintenance Supervisor

Surrey
Up to £43,000 + Excellent Package & Opportunities
Reference
56376

Regional Facilities Manager

South West England
Circa £40,000 + Benefits & Opportunities
Reference
56375
See all jobs »

 

 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to print

Sign up to receive our bi-monthly magazine

Subscribe
Facilitate magazine cover, June 2020
​
FOLLOW US
@Facilitate_Mag
Facilitate Magazine
Facilitate Magazine
CONTACT US
Contact us
Tel: 020 7880 6200
​

IWFM

About IWFM
Become a member
Qualifications
Events

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to Facilitate Magazine
Write for Facilitate Magazine

General

IWFM Jobs
Help

© 2022 • www.facilitatemagazine.com and Facilitate Magazine are published by Redactive Media Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ