Skip to main content
Facilitate Magazine: Informing Workplace and Facilities Management Professionals - return to the homepage Facilitate magazine logo
  • Search
  • Visit Facilitate Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit Facilitate Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @Facilitate_Mag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute of Workplace and Facilities Management Logo of the Institute of Workplace and Facilities Management

Main navigation

  • Home
  • News
    • Comment
    • People
    • Reports
    • Research
  • Features
    • Analysis
    • Features
    • Round Tables
    • Webinars
  • Outsourcing
    • Contract Finder
    • Contracts
    • FM Business Models
    • Interviews
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Opinion
    • Procurement
    • Trends
  • Know-How
    • Explainers
    • Legal Updates
    • White Papers
  • Jobs
  • Topics
    • Workplace Services
      • Hospitality
      • Catering
      • Cleaning
      • Front of House
      • Grounds Maintenance
      • Helpdesk
      • Mailroom
      • Manned Guarding / Security
      • Pest Control
      • Washroom Services
      • Disaster Recovery
      • Specialist Services
    • Professional Performance
      • Behavioural Change
      • Continual Professional Development
      • Education
      • Management
      • Recruitment
      • Training
    • Workplace Performance
      • Benchmarking
      • Health & Wellbeing
      • Operational Readiness
      • Procurement
      • Security
      • Workplace User Experience
      • Workplace Culture
    • Compliance
      • Health & Safety
      • Risk & Business Continuity
      • Standards
      • Statutory Compliance
    • Building Services
      • Architecture & Construction
      • Asset Management
      • Building Controls
      • Building Fabric
      • Drinking Water
      • Fire Protection
      • HVAC
      • Landscaping
      • Mechanical & Electrical
      • Building Security
      • Water, Drainage & Plumbing
    • Technology
      • Building Information Modelling
      • CAFM
      • Data & Networks
      • Document Management
      • Information Management
      • Internet of Things (IoT)
      • Software & Systems
    • Energy management
      • Energy Management Systems
      • Electricity
      • Gas
      • Solar
      • Wind
    • Sustainability
      • Environmental Quality
      • Social Value
      • Waste Management
      • Recycling
    • Workspace Design
      • Agile Working
      • Fit-Out & Refurbishment
      • Inclusive Access
      • Lighting
      • Office Interiors
      • Signage
      • Space Planning
      • Storage
      • Vehicle Management / Parking
      • Washroom
    • Sectors
      • Corporate Office
      • Education
      • Healthcare
      • Manufacturing
      • International
      • Retail
      • Sports & Leisure
      • Regions
  • Buyers' Guide
Quick links:
  • Home
  • News
  • Comment
Topics

The fear behind the IT disasters

Open-access content Wednesday 27th August 2008 — updated 1.52pm, Tuesday 5th May 2020

Anxiety over risk is prompting government to outsource more than just contracts, but the policy process itself

related article
related link

 

by James Woudhuysen

 

20 October 2006

 

The news on outsourcing is bad, really bad. Accenture has bottled out of £2 billion of contracts to manage NHS IT. Gordon Brown, outsourcing's most assiduous backer (PFI, Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee), has outdone even himself. In floating the idea of an "independent" board controlling the NHS, he has extended outsourcing not just to the largest employer in the EU, but also to government policy itself.
FMs need to know that the thrills and spills of an outsourcing contract are nought compared to the dangers of outsourcing policy direction. The latter is, first, bad for democracy: second, it is bad for management.

 

For proof, look no further than... NHS IT. But let's get the origins of the cock-ups right. It starts from the market economics of private sector greed and corruption, when it should start from the New Labour politics of public sector fear and irresponsibility.
The litany has it that private sector specialists in outsourcing recruit ex-public sector bigwigs to help them win high profit, low wage deals at the taxpayer's expense.

 

But wait. What the litany misses is how the confused chains of command that surround public sector outsourcing are the logical outcome of fears: fears that bad medicine or bad medical IT will lead to political scandal and mass litigation. Fear of risk makes New Labour directorates outsource not just operations, but political ambition itself.

 

In Public services and ICT: where next for transformational government?, a recent report for Adobe Systems Europe, Work Foundation researchers Alexandra Jones and Laura Williams take a very different view from mine. They list many things that government IT projects lack in terms of leadership; skills and resources; and implementation. Good, neutral, technocratic stuff.

 

But why does the Work Foundation also have stiff words for 'scope creep' in public sector IT projects? Because it seriously believes that "government is too eager to take risks" over IT. The report contains 56 mentions of 'risk' but just two of 'innovation'. Indeed, the Financial Times quoted one of the authors as saying that the public sector "should not be about cutting-edge innovation".

 

I call this approach irresponsible, because it wants to slow down innovation, and subject leaders of public-private partnerships to yet more regulation. They should, it seems, "be required to publish ICT accounts" covering - you guessed - "the risk of poor performance in coming years".

 

While outsourcing companies and public sector managers must publish accounts, Her Majesty's Government refuses to be held to account. It outsources not so much costs or staff, as the very process of making promises and delivering upon them. No matter how grateful outsourcing specialists are for the business they are given, they should say that the outsourcing of policy is a step too far.

 

James Woudhuysen is professor of forecasting and innovation at De Montford University

Also filed in:
Comment
Content
Topics

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Today's top reads

 

Latest Jobs

Project Leader (Maternity Cover One Year Contract)

Cambridge
Circa £50,000 Pro Rata + Benefits & Opportunities
Reference
56378

Maintenance Supervisor

Surrey
Up to £43,000 + Excellent Package & Opportunities
Reference
56376

Regional Facilities Manager

South West England
Circa £40,000 + Benefits & Opportunities
Reference
56375
See all jobs »

 

 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to print

Sign up to receive our bi-monthly magazine

Subscribe
Facilitate magazine cover, June 2020
​
FOLLOW US
@Facilitate_Mag
Facilitate Magazine
Facilitate Magazine
CONTACT US
Contact us
Tel: 020 7880 6200
​

IWFM

About IWFM
Become a member
Qualifications
Events

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to Facilitate Magazine
Write for Facilitate Magazine

General

IWFM Jobs
Help

© 2022 • www.facilitatemagazine.com and Facilitate Magazine are published by Redactive Media Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ