Skip to main content
Facilitate Magazine: Informing Workplace and Facilities Management Professionals - return to the homepage Facilitate magazine logo
  • Search
  • Visit Facilitate Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit Facilitate Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @Facilitate_Mag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute of Workplace and Facilities Management Logo of the Institute of Workplace and Facilities Management

Main navigation

  • Home
  • News
    • Comment
    • People
    • Reports
    • Research
  • Features
    • Analysis
    • Features
    • Round Tables
    • Webinars
  • Outsourcing
    • Contract Finder
    • Contracts
    • FM Business Models
    • Interviews
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Opinion
    • Procurement
    • Trends
  • Know-How
    • Explainers
    • Legal Updates
    • White Papers
  • Jobs
  • Topics
    • Workplace Services
      • Hospitality
      • Catering
      • Cleaning
      • Front of House
      • Grounds Maintenance
      • Helpdesk
      • Mailroom
      • Manned Guarding / Security
      • Pest Control
      • Washroom Services
      • Disaster Recovery
      • Specialist Services
    • Professional Performance
      • Behavioural Change
      • Continual Professional Development
      • Education
      • Management
      • Recruitment
      • Training
    • Workplace Performance
      • Benchmarking
      • Health & Wellbeing
      • Operational Readiness
      • Procurement
      • Security
      • Workplace User Experience
      • Workplace Culture
    • Compliance
      • Health & Safety
      • Risk & Business Continuity
      • Standards
      • Statutory Compliance
    • Building Services
      • Architecture & Construction
      • Asset Management
      • Building Controls
      • Building Fabric
      • Drinking Water
      • Fire Protection
      • HVAC
      • Landscaping
      • Mechanical & Electrical
      • Building Security
      • Water, Drainage & Plumbing
    • Technology
      • Building Information Modelling
      • CAFM
      • Data & Networks
      • Document Management
      • Information Management
      • Internet of Things (IoT)
      • Software & Systems
    • Energy management
      • Energy Management Systems
      • Electricity
      • Gas
      • Solar
      • Wind
    • Sustainability
      • Environmental Quality
      • Social Value
      • Waste Management
      • Recycling
    • Workspace Design
      • Agile Working
      • Fit-Out & Refurbishment
      • Inclusive Access
      • Lighting
      • Office Interiors
      • Signage
      • Space Planning
      • Storage
      • Vehicle Management / Parking
      • Washroom
    • Sectors
      • Corporate Office
      • Education
      • Healthcare
      • Manufacturing
      • International
      • Retail
      • Sports & Leisure
      • Regions
  • Buyers' Guide
Quick links:
  • Home
  • Sections
  • Topics
Features
Sections
Features
Management
Space Planning
Health & Wellbeing

Activity-based pros and cons

Open-access content Monday 21st September 2015 — updated 4.00pm, Tuesday 26th May 2020
From the archive:  Just so you know, this article is more than 3 years old.
Activity working 1

'Activity-based' offices offer more flexibility in workstyle choice, but they also require managers capable of imposing strong user discipline if they're to be truly effective — as research at the Center for People and Buildings, Delft University of Technology, has found.

21 September 2015 | By Iris de Been, Marion Beijer, Dorieke den Hollander


New developments in office environments are typically based on the expectation that the effectiveness of the environment will increase and productivity levels will grow. 


Another aim, one often mentioned by Dutch employers, is the desire to be an attractive proposition for future employees. Organisations fret that without a popular and competitive work environment they might lose the 'war on talent' (Rieck & Kelter, 2005). What's more, research shows that offices do indeed influence job satisfaction and productivity (Carlopio, 1996; Veitch et al, 2003).


Many European organisations have already adopted flexible and dynamic office ideas - the Netherlands having seen many so-called 'activity-based' office concepts, (also referred to as flexible or combi-offices).


A core principle of activity-based offices is that users can choose the type of workspace that best fits their activity. Thus, activity-based offices typically offer a great variety of open, half-open and enclosed workplace types - alongside spaces set aside for both informal and formal meetings.


In this regard the activity-based office is similar to the open-plan office - both offer openness and transparency. But in contrast to open-plan, the activity-based office is distinguished by its offering of both open and enclosed workspaces and the elimination of assigned desks - all employees share all the available places.


Managers of activity-based offices often deploy a clean-desk policy to ensure that enough workplaces are available at all times. Employees are expected to clear their desks if they plan to leave them for more than a couple of hours.


The goal of this research was to find out what users found good and bad about activity-based offices, identifying interventions that FMs can make to address problems in existing or future activity-based offices.


The positives

The most frequently mentioned positives were architecture and interior design, with most people liking how these elements contributed to a warm and pleasant atmosphere. The work environment was also perceived as cleaner and tidier compared with more traditional work environments. People also appreciated the large amount of light, use of transparent materials and generally open layout of the building.


People also experienced more communication and knowledge exchange in general. Serendipitous meetings with colleagues and greater interaction between different departments were also cited.


The openness of the work environment was specifically mentioned as a key positive, and people found it easier to see each other and meet new staff. This, said some employees, leads to a more dynamic vibe.


Furniture was another factor regularly described as an advantage. The design of the furniture was particularly valued and employees also appreciated acoustic materials being applied in the work environment to keep down the noise.


Activity working 2


The negatives

Several significant negative issues came out in the group interviews with employees. From these it was clear that the most important downside of the activity-based office environment was the lack of possibilities to concentrate. In some cases respondents specifically complained about the acoustics. Some felt that the more open work areas were uncomfortably crowded; others cited being distracted by the noise and other people moving about.


Another perceived negative was the lack of privacy. Many participants did not like having a confidential conversation or phone call in the open space, often fearing that they would bother others. The lack of visual privacy was also an issue for some employees. This applies especially to the smaller meeting spaces in which confidential conversations should take place.


Indoor climate emerged as a major shortcoming - most complained about temperature or uncomfortable airflow. In some cases concerns about a poor indoor climate in the enclosed spaces were also raised. This was linked to a lack of personal control over the indoor climate because people had to share the space.


The provided mix of workspaces was brought up as a positive aspect, but more frequently a negative one. A main reason for the large number of complaints is that some of the workplace types are simply too popular. People who arrive at the office late in the morning often do not get the opportunity to select the workspace most suited to their activities. The less popular spaces are barely used, so people feel like this is a waste of valuable space.


In more than half of the research cases, support facilities emerged as a drawback (15 cases, 32 interviews), and complicated and inflexible IT systems reduced flexibility for employees. Having to move personal belongings and files from one place to another was also seen as a time-consuming hassle. 


Respondents also said that not everyone switches workplaces during the day or even during the week, regardless of the 'flexible' intent of the activity-based idea. This problem was also reflected in remarks about undesirable 'claiming behaviour' by managers. Addressing annoying behaviour among co-workers was seen as difficult, and people also complained about having to actively search for a workplace - for these people it was just not practical for some functions to work flexibly.


A lack of social interaction with co-workers was cited as a significant concern; many said they could not have a personal conversation with colleagues because of the openness. People also complained about less knowledge sharing and less social bonding with colleagues.


Storage and archiving facilities also came up as a drawback. The shift to a digital archive was not always without problems and in some organisations difficulties continued after moving into the activity-based office.


But despite these issues, the longer people spend in an activity-based office, the more they are likely to enjoy them.



Conclusions

The generally fresh, light and colourful environments generated by activity-based offices are typically relished by workers. 


But the general increase in knowledge sharing and social interaction - evidence that accords with other literature in this field - can perhaps be seen as double-edged. People also report experiencing a decrease in communication with their direct colleagues, as well as difficulties with discussing private issues in open space. The social bond with colleagues also seems to suffer.


One explanation for this is that the openness of the work environment makes it more difficult to share thoughts, feelings and values (Oldham and Brass, 1979). So solving these problems could hinge on mutual agreements on worker availability and 'findability' in the office, as well as the introduction of team-building activities. 


As expected, there were low satisfaction scores when it came to work requiring concentration and privacy. Distractions come mostly in the form of phone calls and conversations in open spaces. Dedicated enclosed spaces for phone calls help solve this common problem, and the same is true for ad hoc meetings, which should be held in dedicated meeting areas or enclosed rooms close by. Confidential meetings should be held in small meeting rooms and enclosed rooms with acoustic and visual privacy. Behaviour also plays an important role; after providing appropriate spaces, employees must be policed to use these specific spaces in the right way (for example, no telephone calls in open spaces).


And although workers certainly appreciate the different types of workplaces an activity-based office offers, the right space is not always available to those who want it when they want it. Because some workplaces tend to be more popular than others, they are claimed regularly (or because people do not clean their desks). 


These issues call for more detailed initial analysis before fit-out of workplace types to ensure provision of a variety of workplaces according to the work done by employees.


All these benefits and drawbacks are influenced by the behaviour of building users. When people use activity-based work environments correctly, they tend to benefit from all of its various elements. The example set by managers plays a key role. Clear rules regarding the use of the work environment can help people to bring up behavioural issues among colleagues.


And although these interviews mainly confirmed much existing knowledge, the results took us a step further in explaining the positive and negative matters cropping up in activity-based offices. 


Activity working 3


Methodology 

  • In this research the results of 20 post-occupancy evaluations were analysed.
  • Case studies consisted of online post-occupancy evaluation with one or several group interviews.
  • POEs were carried out with the Work Environment Diagnosis Instrument (WODI), developed by the Centre for People and Buildings, to gain insight into the perceived positive and negative aspects.
  • Evaluations took place in 20 activity-based workplaces from four semi-public bodies in the Netherlands.
  • Measurements were taken to collect generic data about the experience of the office environment as well as to provide organisations with points of departure to optimise their office concept.
  • Worker population in these cases varied from 31 to 806 employees and averaged 256.
  • From 5,128 building users in the 20 cases invited to take part, 2,377 responded.
  • For insight into aspects of questionnaire results, qualitative data was gathered in semi-structured group interviews.
  • In all, 57 group interviews were conducted with 271 workers to explain results of the corresponding post-occupancy evaluation with the WODI questionnaire. 

 

About the authors Iris de Been, Marion Beijer and Dorieke den Hollander are researchers at the Center for People and Buildings, Delft University of Technology. This research was first presented at the EFMC 2015 Conference in Glasgow.

You may also be interested in...

sit stand 1 chloe crisford

Standing the test of time

Sit-stand desks seem to have come from nowhere, but are now associated with a campaign to "Get Britain Standing" and a growing narrative seeking to rid the UK workforce of sedentary working. Added benefits, claim those in favour, include increased productivity and improved employee wellbeing. But what are they like in practice?

Monday 14th September 2015
Open-access content
social contract 1 credit peter Greenwood

The social contract

Since the passing of the Public Services (Social Value) Act requiring public authorities to incorporate economic, social and environmental wellbeing into services contracts, FM providers are doing more to get involved with local communities. Elisabeth Jeffries reports.

Thursday 10th September 2015
Open-access content
pay it forward 1 istock

Pay it forward

FM should be seen as a value driver in the sense of selling future levels of productivity, say researchers Daniel von Felten, Manuel Böhm and Christian Coenen, who call it 'the multiplier effect'.

Friday 2nd October 2015
Open-access content
lincolnshire 1 alamy

Seeking wise council

The £45 million property services contract in place with Lincolnshire County Council is seen by all parties as significant because of how transparency in communication between interested parties is adding intelligence to decision making. Martin Read reports.

Thursday 24th September 2015
Open-access content
Lores Haiti Getty

The best aid plans

The role of FM within international aid charity ActionAid has developed considerably since Will Bowen joined the organisation, as Jamie Harris reports.

Friday 25th September 2015
Open-access content
Genome 1

Supporting the gene geniuses

To support the quest to find new treatments for diseases and make new scientific discoveries, FM support at the world-class Wellcome Trust Genome Campus research facilities in Cambridgeshire has to match the bold ambitions of the scientists. Following a recent BIFM Eastern Region event on the campus site, Rob Farman reports.

Thursday 8th October 2015
Open-access content
Also filed in
Topics
Features
Content
Features
Management
Space Planning
Health & Wellbeing
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

 

Latest Jobs

Interim Head of Health & Safety

Suffolk
£250.00 - £300.00 per day (premium day rate)
Reference
59637

Contracts & Senior Estates Project Manager

North West England
£29.53 per hour
Reference
59633

Facilities Manager

London (Central)
up to £43,000 + excellent benefits including car
Reference
59631
See all jobs »

 

 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to print

Sign up to receive our bi-monthly magazine

Subscribe
Facilitate magazine cover, June 2020
​
FOLLOW US
@Facilitate_Mag
Facilitate Magazine
Facilitate Magazine
CONTACT US
Contact us
Tel: 020 7880 6200
​

IWFM

About IWFM
Become a member
Qualifications
Events

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to Facilitate Magazine
Write for Facilitate Magazine

General

IWFM Jobs
Help

© 2023 • www.facilitatemagazine.com and Facilitate Magazine are published by Redactive Media Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ