Skip to main content
Facilitate Magazine: Informing Workplace and Facilities Management Professionals - return to the homepage Facilitate magazine logo
  • Search
  • Visit Facilitate Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit Facilitate Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @Facilitate_Mag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute of Workplace and Facilities Management Logo of the Institute of Workplace and Facilities Management

Main navigation

  • Home
  • News
    • Comment
    • People
    • Reports
    • Research
  • Features
    • Analysis
    • Features
    • Round Tables
    • Webinars
  • Outsourcing
    • Contracts
    • FM Business Models
    • Interviews
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Opinion
    • Procurement
    • Trends
  • Know-How
    • Explainers
    • Legal Updates
    • White Papers
  • Jobs
  • Topics
    • Workplace Services
      • Hospitality
      • Catering
      • Cleaning
      • Front of House
      • Grounds Maintenance
      • Helpdesk
      • Mailroom
      • Manned Guarding / Security
      • Pest Control
      • Washroom Services
      • Disaster Recovery
      • Specialist Services
    • Professional Performance
      • Behavioural Change
      • Continual Professional Development
      • Education
      • Management
      • Recruitment
      • Training
    • Workplace Performance
      • Benchmarking
      • Health & Wellbeing
      • Operational Readiness
      • Procurement
      • Security
      • Workplace User Experience
      • Workplace Culture
    • Compliance
      • Health & Safety
      • Risk & Business Continuity
      • Standards
      • Statutory Compliance
    • Building Services
      • Architecture & Construction
      • Asset Management
      • Building Controls
      • Building Fabric
      • Drinking Water
      • Fire Protection
      • HVAC
      • Landscaping
      • Mechanical & Electrical
      • Building Security
      • Water, Drainage & Plumbing
    • Technology
      • Building Information Modelling
      • CAFM
      • Data & Networks
      • Document Management
      • Information Management
      • Internet of Things (IoT)
      • Software & Systems
    • Energy management
      • Energy Management Systems
      • Electricity
      • Gas
      • Solar
      • Wind
    • Sustainability
      • Environmental Quality
      • Social Value
      • Waste Management
      • Recycling
    • Workspace Design
      • Agile Working
      • Fit-Out & Refurbishment
      • Inclusive Access
      • Lighting
      • Office Interiors
      • Signage
      • Space Planning
      • Storage
      • Vehicle Management / Parking
      • Washroom
    • Sectors
      • Corporate Office
      • Education
      • Healthcare
      • Manufacturing
      • International
      • Retail
      • Sports & Leisure
      • Regions
  • Buyers' Guide
Quick links:
  • Home
  • Topics
Know How
Content
Legal Updates
Workplace services
Mailroom
Topics
Know How
Content
Legal Updates
Workplace services
Mailroom

Size matters

Open-access content 28th August 2008

By switching to a charging system  based on the size of a letter rather than its weight the Royal Mail is expecting to make savings. But the changes could also benefit its customers. Geoff Haw explains why weighing and franking may soon become practices of the past

 

12 November 2004

 

The Royal Mail is proposing to switch from the traditional weight-based pricing to a system based on the size of the outer envelope. Essentially, pricing will be based upon the length, width and depth of an envelope.

 

Currently, the charge levied by the Royal Mail for all mail processed (through stamps and franking) is based upon the weight of the item. But, it has been apparent for some time that the size, and not the weight, of an item of mail is the key cost driver of the postal service.

 

The most cost-effective processing involves small, flat uniform-size letters which can be sorted using machines, fit easily through letter boxes and into mail bags. As the Royal Mail currently charges by weight alone, the small items such as C5 envelopes are cross-subsidising the large and bulky but lightweight items.
Although the new pricing method is not due to take affect until September 2005, the change will have an impact on the format of and equipment required to process outgoing mail, and therefore needs to be taken into account now. In essence, the new pricing structure will mean that the smaller the envelope, the cheaper the postage cost. The majority of items will no longer require weighing and franking.

 

It currently costs 28p to send an unfolded single page A4 statement via first class Royal Mail. From next year the cost of sending the same item will increase to 46p. But, if the format is changed and the letter folded into a C5 size envelope, the cost would remain the same at 28p.
For example, Company A routinely sends out 1,000 single sheet A4 statements by first class Royal Mail (all under 60g) which are inserted (unfolded) into an A4 envelope. The cost for despatch of these items under the current and proposed systems are as follows:

 

  • Current (weight-based charging) -
    1,000 x £0.28 = £280

  • Proposed (sized-based charging) - 1,000 x £0.46 = £460

 

Therefore, dispatching statements unfolded in A4 envelopes will increase postage costs by around 164 per cent. The simple solution is to fold the statements and insert them into either DL or CL envelopes (both of which are classified as letters). This change in procedure would eliminate the cost increase entirely.

 

The idea of pricing by size is not a new one, and is already in place in a number of countries across Europe such as Germany and Italy. Sized-based pricing would be applicable to inland letter services only. International, special services, such as Special Delivery  and Recorded, and items weighing over 1kg  would continue to be priced dependent purely upon weight (and their destination).

 

It is clear that action or inaction following the sized-based pricing introduction will have a significant impact on the budget for outgoing mail. But to ensure that each company maximises the potential advantages of the introduction of sized-based charging, a detailed analysis should be undertaken within the next six months. The aim for each analysis should be to document the current profile of outgoing mail. The most important aspect will be to identify light mail items (such as those under 100g) currently being despatched in A4 (or larger) envelopes, where the biggest potential savings advantage exists.

 

The change proposed by the Royal Mail has one major implication for mailrooms over and above the possible change to the type of envelopes being processed, namely the use and configuration of the franking machines. Currently all post despatched via the Royal Mail, regardless of size, weight and destination must be weighed and franked. The proposed changes would require only the following items be processed in this manner: overseas mail items; Royal Mail Special Deliveries and Recorded; and items weighing more than 1kg. Therefore, while the majority of items will no longer require weighing and franking, a small percentage will continue to be processed in this way.
In addition, it appears that all items, except the above, will no longer require franking (as the basis of the charge is on size not weight), as long as the sender's details are clearly marked on the outer envelope. This type of despatch methodology is very close to the current Postage Paid Impressions (PPI) process and the
Document Exchange (DX) circuit.
As a result, mailrooms will in future probably require reduced weighing and franking capability which will impact on both staff and technical resources. This will have a further beneficial effect on postal budgets and resource allocation for the mailroom service.

 

MailSource has produced a bulletin about the implications of the switch from weight- to size-based pricing which is available at www.mailman.co.uk. Further information about the changes is also available at  www. postcomm.gov.uk and www.postwatch.co.uk

 

Geoff Haw is business support director at MailSource UK

 

You've got mail: new business tariff structure and sizes

 

Proposed new size, maximum thickness and weight:

 

Letter: Size not to exceed 240mm x 165mm (larger than A5); 5mm thick and 0-100g

 

Large Letter: Size not to exceed 353mm x 250mm (larger than A4), 10mm thick; 0-250g and 251-500g

 

Packet: More than 10mm thick, longer than 353mm, wider than 250mm or heavier than 500g; 0-250g and 251-1000g

 

For a full version of this table, including additional and changed specifications for business contact pricing compared to the public tariff, plus full public and business price tables, download 'Size-Based Pricing' which can be found at www.royalmail.com/pricebysize

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Most-Popular

 

Latest Jobs

Property Programme Manager - Fire Safety – Student Accommodation (MC)

London (Central)
£100k plus bonus + package
Reference
54310

Interim Head of Health & Safety

London (Central)
£300 per day (PAYE)
Reference
54307

Engineering Manager

Staffordshire
£60,000 + car +bens
Reference
54209
See all jobs »

 

 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to print

Sign up to receive our bi-monthly magazine

Subscribe
Facilitate magazine cover, June 2020
​
FOLLOW US
@Facilitate_Mag
Facilitate Magazine
Facilitate Magazine
CONTACT US
Contact us
Tel: 020 7880 6200
​

IWFM

About IWFM
Become a member
Qualifications
Events

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to Facilitate Magazine
Write for Facilitate Magazine

General

IWFM Jobs
Help

www.facilitatemagazine.com and Facilitate magazine are published by Redactive Media Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive, Level 5, 78 Chamber Street, London, E1 8BL