Skip to main content
Facilitate Magazine: Informing Workplace and Facilities Management Professionals - return to the homepage Facilitate magazine logo
  • Search
  • Visit Facilitate Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit Facilitate Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @Facilitate_Mag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute of Workplace and Facilities Management Logo of the Institute of Workplace and Facilities Management

Main navigation

  • Home
  • News
    • Comment
    • People
    • Reports
    • Research
  • Features
    • Analysis
    • Features
    • Round Tables
    • Webinars
  • Outsourcing
    • Contract Finder
    • Contracts
    • FM Business Models
    • Interviews
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Opinion
    • Procurement
    • Trends
  • Know-How
    • Explainers
    • Legal Updates
    • White Papers
  • Jobs
  • Topics
    • Workplace Services
      • Hospitality
      • Catering
      • Cleaning
      • Front of House
      • Grounds Maintenance
      • Helpdesk
      • Mailroom
      • Manned Guarding / Security
      • Pest Control
      • Washroom Services
      • Disaster Recovery
      • Specialist Services
    • Professional Performance
      • Behavioural Change
      • Continual Professional Development
      • Education
      • Management
      • Recruitment
      • Training
    • Workplace Performance
      • Benchmarking
      • Health & Wellbeing
      • Operational Readiness
      • Procurement
      • Security
      • Workplace User Experience
      • Workplace Culture
    • Compliance
      • Health & Safety
      • Risk & Business Continuity
      • Standards
      • Statutory Compliance
    • Building Services
      • Architecture & Construction
      • Asset Management
      • Building Controls
      • Building Fabric
      • Drinking Water
      • Fire Protection
      • HVAC
      • Landscaping
      • Mechanical & Electrical
      • Building Security
      • Water, Drainage & Plumbing
    • Technology
      • Building Information Modelling
      • CAFM
      • Data & Networks
      • Document Management
      • Information Management
      • Internet of Things (IoT)
      • Software & Systems
    • Energy management
      • Energy Management Systems
      • Electricity
      • Gas
      • Solar
      • Wind
    • Sustainability
      • Environmental Quality
      • Social Value
      • Waste Management
      • Recycling
    • Workspace Design
      • Agile Working
      • Fit-Out & Refurbishment
      • Inclusive Access
      • Lighting
      • Office Interiors
      • Signage
      • Space Planning
      • Storage
      • Vehicle Management / Parking
      • Washroom
    • Sectors
      • Corporate Office
      • Education
      • Healthcare
      • Manufacturing
      • International
      • Retail
      • Sports & Leisure
      • Regions
  • Buyers' Guide
Quick links:
  • Home
  • Topics
Know How
Legal Updates
Compliance
Professional Performance

Clarence House Limited v National Westminster Bank Plc

Open-access content Thursday 18th February 2010 — updated 12.51pm, Tuesday 26th May 2020

In this recent case, the courts considered "virtual assignments", a form of outsourcing device whereby a tenant transfers the economic benefits (such as the collection of rent from sub-tenants) and burdens (such as payment of rent), together with management obligations, under its lease to a third party without getting the landlord’s consent.


by Beverley Vara


28 January 2010

 

In this recent case, the courts considered "virtual assignments", a form of outsourcing device whereby a tenant transfers the economic benefits (such as the collection of rent from sub-tenants) and burdens (such as payment of rent), together with management obligations, under its lease to a third party without getting the landlord's consent. The lease itself is not assigned, nor is there a change in occupancy. Such arrangements are used for example where a landlord's consent cannot in practice be obtained before a scheduled completion date because it is part of a large outsourcing deal involving many properties.

But does this arrangement fall foul of the standard alienation provisions contained in most leases? In January 2009 the High Court said that it did, giving tenants using this device considerable concern. In December however, they breathed a sigh of relief as the decision was reversed.

 

The Facts

Clarence House was the landlord of office premises in Manchester. NatWest was the tenant. The lease contained standard alienation provisions preventing NatWest from subletting or assigning without consent, and from sharing or parting with possession or occupation.

In 2001, NatWest sublet to M (with consent). In 2005, NatWest assigned (without consent) the economic benefits and burdens under its lease to a third party, N, by granting N power of attorney and appointing it as its agent vis-à-vis all dealings with the premises (including paying rent to Clarence House and receiving rent from M). Upon discovering the arrangement Clarence House issued proceedings seeking a declaration that the arrangement constituted a breach of the lease.

 

What did the court say?

At first instance, the High Court held in favour of Clarence House. Although NatWest had not breached the covenants against subletting, assigning or declaring a trust, it had breached the covenant against parting or sharing with possession because it had given up control of the property, including the right to receive rent, which the Court held was part of the definition of "possession".

However, the Court of Appeal disagreed and held in favour of NatWest. "Possession" in this context means having the right to occupy premises to the exclusion of others (which M had, not N) and did not include the receipt of rent or the right to receive rent. Even if it had included the receipt of rent there was no breach because N received rent as agent for NatWest. If it included the right to receive rent (because N could keep the rents), there was no breach because N still had no proprietary interest in the lease.

 

What does this mean?

Landlords may want to consider with their legal advisers how to address this situation going forward, in particular whether they want to amend their alienation provisions. Tenants using this arrangement can relax but might check their lease and the facts carefully to see if they are in danger of any similar argument being run. If you have any concerns, you should take legal advice.

 

Beverley Vara is a partner and head of real estate litigation at Allen and Overy


 

Also filed in:
Topics
Know How
Content
Legal Updates
Compliance
Professional Performance

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Today's top reads

 

Latest Jobs

Project Leader (Maternity Cover One Year Contract)

Cambridge
Circa £50,000 Pro Rata + Benefits & Opportunities
Reference
56378

Maintenance Supervisor

Surrey
Up to £43,000 + Excellent Package & Opportunities
Reference
56376

Regional Facilities Manager

South West England
Circa £40,000 + Benefits & Opportunities
Reference
56375
See all jobs »

 

 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to print

Sign up to receive our bi-monthly magazine

Subscribe
Facilitate magazine cover, June 2020
​
FOLLOW US
@Facilitate_Mag
Facilitate Magazine
Facilitate Magazine
CONTACT US
Contact us
Tel: 020 7880 6200
​

IWFM

About IWFM
Become a member
Qualifications
Events

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to Facilitate Magazine
Write for Facilitate Magazine

General

IWFM Jobs
Help

© 2022 • www.facilitatemagazine.com and Facilitate Magazine are published by Redactive Media Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ