Skip to main content
Facilitate Magazine: Informing Workplace and Facilities Management Professionals - return to the homepage Facilitate magazine logo
  • Search
  • Visit Facilitate Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit Facilitate Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @Facilitate_Mag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute of Workplace and Facilities Management Logo of the Institute of Workplace and Facilities Management

Main navigation

  • Home
  • News
    • Comment
    • People
    • Reports
    • Research
  • Features
    • Analysis
    • Features
    • Round Tables
    • Webinars
  • Outsourcing
    • Contract Finder
    • Contracts
    • FM Business Models
    • Interviews
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Opinion
    • Procurement
    • Trends
  • Know-How
    • Explainers
    • Legal Updates
    • White Papers
  • Jobs
  • Topics
    • Workplace Services
      • Hospitality
      • Catering
      • Cleaning
      • Front of House
      • Grounds Maintenance
      • Helpdesk
      • Mailroom
      • Manned Guarding / Security
      • Pest Control
      • Washroom Services
      • Disaster Recovery
      • Specialist Services
    • Professional Performance
      • Behavioural Change
      • Continual Professional Development
      • Education
      • Management
      • Recruitment
      • Training
    • Workplace Performance
      • Benchmarking
      • Health & Wellbeing
      • Operational Readiness
      • Procurement
      • Security
      • Workplace User Experience
      • Workplace Culture
    • Compliance
      • Health & Safety
      • Risk & Business Continuity
      • Standards
      • Statutory Compliance
    • Building Services
      • Architecture & Construction
      • Asset Management
      • Building Controls
      • Building Fabric
      • Drinking Water
      • Fire Protection
      • HVAC
      • Landscaping
      • Mechanical & Electrical
      • Building Security
      • Water, Drainage & Plumbing
    • Technology
      • Building Information Modelling
      • CAFM
      • Data & Networks
      • Document Management
      • Information Management
      • Internet of Things (IoT)
      • Software & Systems
    • Energy management
      • Energy Management Systems
      • Electricity
      • Gas
      • Solar
      • Wind
    • Sustainability
      • Environmental Quality
      • Social Value
      • Waste Management
      • Recycling
    • Workspace Design
      • Agile Working
      • Fit-Out & Refurbishment
      • Inclusive Access
      • Lighting
      • Office Interiors
      • Signage
      • Space Planning
      • Storage
      • Vehicle Management / Parking
      • Washroom
    • Sectors
      • Corporate Office
      • Education
      • Healthcare
      • Manufacturing
      • International
      • Retail
      • Sports & Leisure
      • Regions
  • Buyers' Guide
Quick links:
  • Home
  • Topics
Know How
Legal Updates
Compliance
Sustainability
HVAC
Environmental Quality

Air conditioning and refrigeration costs and the banning of R22

Open-access content Monday 9th February 2015 — updated 4.00pm, Tuesday 26th May 2020

In the light of new rules on hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) the next time the building's air conditioning system breaks down FMs will have much to consider, says Linda Fletcher 


29 January 2015


From 1 January it has been illegal to use recycled or reclaimed hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), which include the ozone-depleting refrigerant gas R22, to maintain existing refrigeration, heat pump and air conditioning (RAC) systems. 


R22 is common in pre-2004 RAC systems and so its ban will have a big effect on air-conditioning and refrigeration costs. HCFCs have not been legal for use in new RAC equipment since 2004. In 2010 a ban was imposed on the use of 'virgin' HCFCs to maintain existing RAC equipment. Since then, only recycled HCFCs obtained from decommissioned RAC equipment or reclaimed HCFCs can be used to maintain existing systems. 


Now RAC systems can no longer be maintained or serviced, including any topping up of the systems, with any HCFCs. So when RAC systems using HCFCs break down or need servicing or topping up, FMs must consider:

  • Replacing the system with new RAC equipment that uses a different, permitted non-ozone depleting substance; and
  • Converting the existing system so it can use a non-ozone depleting substance. This will involve having to replace parts of the current RAC system.

 

Several factors influence the cost-benefit analysis, including:

  • The age of the RAC system;
  • The efficiency of the system;
  • Leakage problems;
  • Compatibililty of alternative non-ozone depleting substances;
  • Efficiency and availability of non-ozone depleting systems; and
  • Equipment manufacturers' advice about using modern non-ozone depleting substance.

 

Some manufacturers say using modern non-ozone depleting substances in converted RAC systems means poorer performance and higher energy costs - something owners, tenants and FMs will want to avoid given laws such as the Carbon Reduction Commitment Energy Efficiency Scheme and the proposed laws on Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards (under the Energy Act 2011). 


The proposed Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards will be published soon, making it unlawful in England and Wales to let properties with an EPC rating of 'F' or 'G' after April 2018 without making energy efficiency improvements. It will also be unlawful to let those properties (i.e. for a lease to continue if granted before April 2018) from April 2023. Works to improve the EPC rating may include replacing inefficient RAC systems.  


F-gases

In addition to banning the use of HCFCs there are also prohibitions on using certain fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-gases), the most important of which are hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). F-gases are also used in many RAC systems. This law regulates the reduction of emissions of F-gases (mainly through better containment). A new 2014 EU regulation limits the amount of F-gases that can be sold as it:

  • Introduces a phase-down measure to cut F-gas emissions by two-thirds by 2030, mainly by phasing out HFCs; and
  • Bans use of F-gases in most new equipment and ensures leakage checks and recovery of F-gases used in existing equipment.

 

Property owners, occupiers, FMs and RAC maintenance contractors must also comply. 


Issues for FMs 

Who will pay for these changes? This will depend on the wording of the lease. Service charge schedules, repair clauses and statutory compliance clauses will be particularly relevant. 


In a multi-let building the service charge provisions will determine if the costs of dealing with the prohibition can be recovered by the landlord from its tenants. Review whether the provisions allow for the costs of repair, improvement and/or replacement of any RAC system can be charged to the tenants.


What constitutes repair, improvement or replacement is not always clear. If the RAC equipment still functions, although not in the most energy-efficient way, does that mean it is in disrepair? The RICS Code for Service Charges in Commercial Property (Third Edition) has advice on how to distinguish between the costs of repair, improvement and replacement when deciding whether to charge costs to the service charge. Service charge costs should not generally include the cost of improvements beyond repair, maintenance or replacement.


For current tenants it may be that those responsible for repair, improvement or replacement of RAC equipment will factor that responsibility into their decision on whether to exercise a break option. They will wish to review the existing terms of their leases on repair and service charges. The issue could also be significant to discussions about dilapidations at the expiry of a lease. How the ban will affect rent reviews remains to be seen; a split market could emerge with greater rents being obtainable for premises with new or converted RAC systems.

 

For prospective tenants, including those renewing a lease, carrying out due diligence will include checking whether the RAC systems use HCFCs or F-gases. Repair obligations and the extent of the service charge will be relevant to discussions at the start of a lease, with new tenants likely to try to negotiate the exclusion of such costs from these clauses and/or requiring a cap on service charge liability. Tenants may also demand that such equipment be replaced or converted before the lease starts.


Pre-lease surveys are vital; FMs will need to take account of the status of the RAC systems and potential costs relating to these. They should plan for the upgrade of older RAC, and establish who is going to be responsible for the costs during lease negotiations.  


This article does not constitute legal advice. Specific legal advice should be taken before acting on any of the topics covered.


Linda Fletcher is a legal director at Pinsent Masons

Also filed in:
Topics
Know How
Content
Legal Updates
Compliance
Sustainability
HVAC
Environmental Quality

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Today's top reads

 

Latest Jobs

Project Leader (Maternity Cover One Year Contract)

Cambridge
Circa £50,000 Pro Rata + Benefits & Opportunities
Reference
56378

Maintenance Supervisor

Surrey
Up to £43,000 + Excellent Package & Opportunities
Reference
56376

Regional Facilities Manager

South West England
Circa £40,000 + Benefits & Opportunities
Reference
56375
See all jobs »

 

 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to print

Sign up to receive our bi-monthly magazine

Subscribe
Facilitate magazine cover, June 2020
​
FOLLOW US
@Facilitate_Mag
Facilitate Magazine
Facilitate Magazine
CONTACT US
Contact us
Tel: 020 7880 6200
​

IWFM

About IWFM
Become a member
Qualifications
Events

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to Facilitate Magazine
Write for Facilitate Magazine

General

IWFM Jobs
Help

© 2022 • www.facilitatemagazine.com and Facilitate Magazine are published by Redactive Media Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ