Skip to main content
Facilitate Magazine: Informing Workplace and Facilities Management Professionals - return to the homepage Facilitate magazine logo
  • Search
  • Visit Facilitate Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit Facilitate Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @Facilitate_Mag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute of Workplace and Facilities Management Logo of the Institute of Workplace and Facilities Management

Main navigation

  • Home
  • News
    • Comment
    • People
    • Reports
    • Research
  • Features
    • Analysis
    • Features
    • Round Tables
    • Webinars
  • Outsourcing
    • Contracts
    • FM Business Models
    • Interviews
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Opinion
    • Procurement
    • Trends
  • Know-How
    • Explainers
    • Legal Updates
    • White Papers
  • Jobs
  • Topics
    • Workplace Services
      • Hospitality
      • Catering
      • Cleaning
      • Front of House
      • Grounds Maintenance
      • Helpdesk
      • Mailroom
      • Manned Guarding / Security
      • Pest Control
      • Washroom Services
      • Disaster Recovery
      • Specialist Services
    • Professional Performance
      • Behavioural Change
      • Continual Professional Development
      • Education
      • Management
      • Recruitment
      • Training
    • Workplace Performance
      • Benchmarking
      • Health & Wellbeing
      • Operational Readiness
      • Procurement
      • Security
      • Workplace User Experience
      • Workplace Culture
    • Compliance
      • Health & Safety
      • Risk & Business Continuity
      • Standards
      • Statutory Compliance
    • Building Services
      • Architecture & Construction
      • Asset Management
      • Building Controls
      • Building Fabric
      • Drinking Water
      • Fire Protection
      • HVAC
      • Landscaping
      • Mechanical & Electrical
      • Building Security
      • Water, Drainage & Plumbing
    • Technology
      • Building Information Modelling
      • CAFM
      • Data & Networks
      • Document Management
      • Information Management
      • Internet of Things (IoT)
      • Software & Systems
    • Energy management
      • Energy Management Systems
      • Electricity
      • Gas
      • Solar
      • Wind
    • Sustainability
      • Environmental Quality
      • Social Value
      • Waste Management
      • Recycling
    • Workspace Design
      • Agile Working
      • Fit-Out & Refurbishment
      • Inclusive Access
      • Lighting
      • Office Interiors
      • Signage
      • Space Planning
      • Storage
      • Vehicle Management / Parking
      • Washroom
    • Sectors
      • Corporate Office
      • Education
      • Healthcare
      • Manufacturing
      • International
      • Retail
      • Sports & Leisure
      • Regions
  • Buyers' Guide
Quick links:
  • Home
  • Topics
Know How
Content
Legal Updates
Compliance
Topics
Know How
Content
Legal Updates
Compliance

Vicarious liability

Open-access content 5th April 2016
Victoria Smithyman

Organisations run the risk of being found vicariously liable even if the person isn't technically an employee, explains solicitor Victoria Smithyman


7 April 2016 | By Victoria Smithyman


It is fair to say that almost all organisations or groups in the UK are aware of the liability risk posed by the actions of their employees.


But should this concern extend to those individuals who are not formal employees? What about those situations where the employee pursues their own interests?

The fact is that employees, contractors and other workers are human, capable of independent thought and action, and sometimes make mistakes. Should the employer ultimately be held legally liable?
These are matters that have recently been considered by the Supreme Court.


1. What is vicarious liability?
Traditionally, the concept of vicarious liability has been considered in terms of an employer being responsible and therefore liable for any negligent acts of their employees which occur during the course of their employment.

It is clear that in light of the direct employer/employee relationship there is a real risk that an employer will generally be held 'vicariously liable' for the actions of their staff.

But what happens when the lines of the employment relationship are blurred? The law surrounding this is convoluted. However, the Supreme Court has recently given us some food for thought.


2. Defining the blurred lines
The case of Cox v Ministry of Justice [2016] UKSC 10 stated that an organisation could still potentially be held vicariously liable despite there being no formal employer/employee relationship.

Importantly, the payment of a wage was not essential for a finding of vicarious liability rather than the contribution the individual makes to the organisation. In this case, the claimant was a catering manager at a prison. She was injured when a prison inmate carrying sacks of rice accidentally dropped one onto the claimant.

The question was could the prison be held vicariously liable for the actions of the prisoner? The conclusion of the Supreme Court was 'yes'.

The inmate, although not an employee, was contributing to the day-to-day operation of the prison - keeping inmates and prison staff fed. While undertaking this work he was "furthering the aims" of the prison and so the Supreme Court concluded it was vicariously liable.


3. 'What about employees 'acting out'?
What about those situations where the employee acts in their own interest and without any instructions from his employer?

The case of Mohamud v WM Morrisons Supermarkets Plc [2016] UKSC 11 deals definitively with this point.

In this case a Morrisons employee 'A' was working in a petrol station kiosk. Unprovoked, 'A' then launched a foul-mouthed verbal and, eventually, physical attack on the claimant.

The claimant argued that Morrisons was vicariously liable for the actions of its employee.

Initially, both the county court and Court of Appeal found for the defendant Morrisons. They concluded that the actions of 'A' and the nature of his employment were not sufficiently "closely connected" and therefore Morrisons could not be responsible.

The Supreme Court, however, thought differently. The court decided that it did not matter why the employee acted the way he did and what his overall aim was. The fact that he used his employment position for his acts means that the employer was held responsible for the employee's actions.

LJ Toulson states in his judgement: "It was a gross abuse of his position, but it was in connection with the business in which he was employed to serve customers. His employers entrusted him with that position and it is just that as between them and the claimant, they should be held responsible for their employee's abuse of it."

In this case the employee was employed in a customer service role. The fundamental aspect of this role was his interaction with customers.

The Supreme Court concluded that he used his employment position to carry out the attack on the claimant.

Even though it was clearly 'A's personal agenda to carry out the attack, his employment provided the opportunity to do so and, as a result, his employer was held vicariously responsible.


4. Where does this leave us?
Ultimately, all organisations run the risk of being found vicariously liable for the actions of individuals acting for or on their behalf, regardless of whether a formal contract of employment or remuneration exists.

The recent cases have widened the net to include all people with a function within an enterprise and not simply an employee. If the person then uses their role to commit an act of negligence, the fact remains that the organisation could still be held liable. You have been warned.

 

Victoria Smithyman is a solicitor at HardingEvans

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Most-Popular

 

Latest Jobs

Property Programme Manager - Fire Safety – Student Accommodation (MC)

London (Central)
£100k plus bonus + package
Reference
54310

Interim Head of Health & Safety

London (Central)
£300 per day (PAYE)
Reference
54307

Engineering Manager

Staffordshire
£60,000 + car +bens
Reference
54209
See all jobs »

 

 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to print

Sign up to receive our bi-monthly magazine

Subscribe
Facilitate magazine cover, June 2020
​
FOLLOW US
@Facilitate_Mag
Facilitate Magazine
Facilitate Magazine
CONTACT US
Contact us
Tel: 020 7880 6200
​

IWFM

About IWFM
Become a member
Qualifications
Events

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to Facilitate Magazine
Write for Facilitate Magazine

General

IWFM Jobs
Help

www.facilitatemagazine.com and Facilitate magazine are published by Redactive Media Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive, Level 5, 78 Chamber Street, London, E1 8BL