Skip to main content
Facilitate Magazine: Informing Workplace and Facilities Management Professionals - return to the homepage Facilitate magazine logo
  • Search
  • Visit Facilitate Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit Facilitate Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @Facilitate_Mag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute of Workplace and Facilities Management Logo of the Institute of Workplace and Facilities Management

Main navigation

  • Home
  • News
    • Comment
    • People
    • Reports
    • Research
  • Features
    • Analysis
    • Features
    • Round Tables
    • Webinars
  • Outsourcing
    • Contract Finder
    • Contracts
    • FM Business Models
    • Interviews
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Opinion
    • Procurement
    • Trends
  • Know-How
    • Explainers
    • Legal Updates
    • White Papers
  • Jobs
  • Topics
    • Workplace Services
      • Hospitality
      • Catering
      • Cleaning
      • Front of House
      • Grounds Maintenance
      • Helpdesk
      • Mailroom
      • Manned Guarding / Security
      • Pest Control
      • Washroom Services
      • Disaster Recovery
      • Specialist Services
    • Professional Performance
      • Behavioural Change
      • Continual Professional Development
      • Education
      • Management
      • Recruitment
      • Training
    • Workplace Performance
      • Benchmarking
      • Health & Wellbeing
      • Operational Readiness
      • Procurement
      • Security
      • Workplace User Experience
      • Workplace Culture
    • Compliance
      • Health & Safety
      • Risk & Business Continuity
      • Standards
      • Statutory Compliance
    • Building Services
      • Architecture & Construction
      • Asset Management
      • Building Controls
      • Building Fabric
      • Drinking Water
      • Fire Protection
      • HVAC
      • Landscaping
      • Mechanical & Electrical
      • Building Security
      • Water, Drainage & Plumbing
    • Technology
      • Building Information Modelling
      • CAFM
      • Data & Networks
      • Document Management
      • Information Management
      • Internet of Things (IoT)
      • Software & Systems
    • Energy management
      • Energy Management Systems
      • Electricity
      • Gas
      • Solar
      • Wind
    • Sustainability
      • Environmental Quality
      • Social Value
      • Waste Management
      • Recycling
    • Workspace Design
      • Agile Working
      • Fit-Out & Refurbishment
      • Inclusive Access
      • Lighting
      • Office Interiors
      • Signage
      • Space Planning
      • Storage
      • Vehicle Management / Parking
      • Washroom
    • Sectors
      • Corporate Office
      • Education
      • Healthcare
      • Manufacturing
      • International
      • Retail
      • Sports & Leisure
      • Regions
  • Buyers' Guide
Quick links:
  • Home
  • Topics
News
Building Services
Workplace services
Workplace Performance
Professional Performance

Survey: Carillion sub-contractors facing huge losses

Open-access content Tuesday 23rd January 2018 — updated 2.38pm, Tuesday 5th May 2020
Carillion stock

BIFM issues statement on Carillion’s collapse

Carillion collapse puts outsourced FM in national spotlight

2016-to-2018: FM World stories track Carillion’s demise

23 January 2018 | Herpreet Kaur Grewal


A snap poll of Carillion engineering sub-contractors shows that many companies are facing huge financial losses from the collapse of the construction giant.

 

Data obtained by the Building Engineering Services Association (BESA) and the electrotechnical and engineering services trade body ECA shows that Carillion owes about £75 million to around 80 engineering services firms that provide vital services such as electrical, plumbing, gas, fire and security, and heating and ventilation.

 

The overall losses are likely to be far higher, given that there are thousands of businesses operating in the industry. The engineering services sector is the largest part of the construction industry by value.

 

The ECA and BESA survey shows that contractors of all sizes have been affected by Carillion's demise.

 

  • • The total value of ongoing contracts with Carillion is worth £47.2 million, which are now at risk.

  • • Micro businesses (fewer than 10 employees) are owed on average £98,000. One of these SMEs is owed over £250,000.

  • • Small firms (10-49 employees) are owed £141,000 on average. One of these contractors is owed £800,000 by Carillion.

  • • Medium-sized businesses (50- 249 employees) are owed on average £236,000. One of these firms is owed almost £1.4 million.

  • • Large businesses (250 employees +) are owed on average £15.6 million. This figure includes Balfour Beatty's widely reported £45 million loss from joint ventures with Carillion.

  

Last week, BESA and ECA met with liquidator PwC and the government. PwC said any private sector work undertaken by Carillion suppliers before 15 January this year would be unpaid. Instead, it would be treated as 'unsecured debt', and placed at the back of the queue behind other creditors.

 

BESA president Tim Hopkinson said: "We knew the fallout from this seismic episode would be extremely serious, but these figures give us a clearer picture of just how hard our sector is going to hit in terms of the thousands of pounds of unsecured debt that will be lost by ordinary hard-working small businesses, jeopardising their future and the future of their staff."

 

ECA director of business Paul Reeve said: "These findings underline the need for concerted action from the government and banks to protect and support SMEs in the construction and services sector. The government should also introduce legal measures to ensure SMEs are not continually exposed to upstream insolvency."

 

Both ECA and BESA have long called for reform to unfair payment practices within construction. Carillion was widely known to take over four months to pay suppliers, despite 30-day payment being industry good practice. To tackle this slow payment, the two trade bodies are calling on the government to pay small and medium-sized businesses directly, using 'project bank accounts'.

 

BESA and ECA are also supporting a bill tabled by Peter Aldous MP, which is currently going through Parliament. The bill would prevent clients and main contractors, such as Carillion, from using their own accounts to store money held back from suppliers in case of defects - ring-fenced, independent accounts would be used instead. 

 

 

Also filed in:
Topics
News
Content
Building Services
Workplace services
Workplace Performance
Professional Performance

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Today's top reads

 

Latest Jobs

Project Leader (Maternity Cover One Year Contract)

Cambridge
Circa £50,000 Pro Rata + Benefits & Opportunities
Reference
56378

Maintenance Supervisor

Surrey
Up to £43,000 + Excellent Package & Opportunities
Reference
56376

Regional Facilities Manager

South West England
Circa £40,000 + Benefits & Opportunities
Reference
56375
See all jobs »

 

 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to print

Sign up to receive our bi-monthly magazine

Subscribe
Facilitate magazine cover, June 2020
​
FOLLOW US
@Facilitate_Mag
Facilitate Magazine
Facilitate Magazine
CONTACT US
Contact us
Tel: 020 7880 6200
​

IWFM

About IWFM
Become a member
Qualifications
Events

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to Facilitate Magazine
Write for Facilitate Magazine

General

IWFM Jobs
Help

© 2022 • www.facilitatemagazine.com and Facilitate Magazine are published by Redactive Media Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ